hi Wheeler! I ever port the sweet-expression as a language module for Guile, and I have such an honor to say it's based on your work. There're still some bugs I need to face. But it works fine already. https://gitorious.org/nacre/guile-sweet
Anyway, I'd like to see it becomes SRFIs. I've proposed it to be one of official language module since there's multi-language feature in Guile-2.x. And it's more convenient to do that if we make sweet-expression the SRFIs. On Sun, 2012-08-26 at 13:02 -0400, David A. Wheeler wrote: > All: > > I'd really like feedback on proposed new SRFIs, and I'd like to help get > these SRFIs implemented in guile. > > Background: The "readable" group has developed and refined 3 new reader > abbreviations for Scheme: curly-infix-, neoteric-, and sweet-expressions. > Each builds on the previous one; details are here: > http://readable.sourceforge.net > > We plan to submit all three abbreviations as three separate SRFIs. The > first one, curly-infix-expressions, is new draft SRFI 105, and we'd > ESPECIALLY like comments on that: > http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-105/ > > The whole point of a SRFI is to get it *implemented*, so if you have a > comment (such as a *problem* with them or getting any of them implemented in > guile), please let us know!! The best way to comment is the mailing lists > (for the SRFIs or via readable.sourceforge.net), so that everyone can discuss > and address them. > > Also, I'd be happy to help get these implemented as part of guile. We have a > current implementation that builds on *top* of guile (by completely > re-implementing the reader), but it'd far better to have these built-in. > > Thanks for your time! > > --- David A. Wheeler >
