On Tue 03 Jul 2012 23:47, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: >> This should be fixed. Otherwise it's impossible to document in any >> sane fashion. >> >> Suggestion: change scm_to_pointer to SCM_POINTER_VALUE. WDYT? > > I’m happy with this change. Mark? > > (Back then, I was skeptical about the usefulness of the C pointer API. > I have since used ‘SCM_POINTER_VALUE’ and ‘scm_from_pointer’ in > Guile-GCC, which uses a mixed dynamic/static FFI, and for good reasons.)
On second thought, let's leave it in. It is terribly confusing, but alternatives are worse. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/
