@Noah: Could you apply the patch to fix ecmascript? http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2012-05/msg00001.html
@Andy: How about these patches: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2012-02/msg00196.html http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2012-02/msg00165.html On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Noah Lavine <noah.b.lav...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think bug 10623 is fixed in stable-2.0, but I don't know how to > close it in the tracker. > > Thanks, > Noah > > On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> wrote: >> Hello! >> >> Still hesitant between writing a native code back-end for IA64 and >> making Guile multiboot-compliant? Hesitate no more! >> >> Time has come for 2.0.6, so let’s squash bugs! >> >> One thing I’d like to get in by then is the SRFI-9 “functional record >> setters”. Mark: what’s your take on this? >> >> Optionally, integrating SRFI-64 would be great. >> >> Other than that, fixing as many bugs as we can. >> >> Any other ideas? >> >> Andy: would you like to take care of NEWS? :-) >> >> I’ll be mostly away from July 9th for some time, so I could push the >> tarball by then, or otherwise during the GHM. >> >> Thanks, >> Ludo’. >> >> >
