Hello, >> Unless there is going to be some other distinction between core and >> extensions, it would seem more natural to me to document everything by >> functionality, in the same part of the manual. Some sections would >> correspond to modules, because modules are also supposed to group >> things by functionality, but that would not be the rule for how the >> manual worked. What do you think? > > I tend to agree, but then I’m not sure what a better sectioning would be > in practice. Any ideas?
I think of our current situation as having three top-level lists of functionality, in API Reference, Guile Modules, and Standard Library. How about just merging them into one list? > Perhaps this could be worked out in ‘master’, so that node names don’t > change for 2.0.x. Yes, I certainly agree that we shouldn't change this for 2.0. Thanks, Noah
