l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Adding ‘scm_to_pointer’ is nice, but ‘SCM_POINTER_VALUE’ is also meant > to be public (and should be documented.)
Okay.
> I’m curious: why would one want to use the FFI’s C API?
Apparently he wanted to create a C callback to a Scheme procedure (using
procedure->pointer), but wanted to do the rest from C.
Mark
