On Wed 18 Jan 2012 22:18, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> (('apply (f args))
> (apply (eval f env) (eval args env)))
This is in primitive-eval (and here, `eval' is locally bound). Mark is
talking about R5RS `eval' (`scm_eval').
> How does 1.8’s CEVAL behave?
CEVAL isn't relevant, because it's part of a lower level than `eval'.
1.8 also has this same problem with `eval'.
> It would be good to have test cases written against 1.8 that illustrate
> the behavior of (current-module) in different contexts. Then we could
> see whether/how the same behavior can be achieved in 2.0.
>
> WDYT?
It's a good idea (for someone else to do ;-)))
Cheers,
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
