Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com> writes: > What if instead we implemented closure serialization somehow? Then we > would handle procedural macros too, and bound-identifiers would still be > sufficient. > > Maybe that idea is a little too crazy.
Are we still talking about Scheme? The language with call-with-current-continuation? "a little too crazy" is not a criterion. "Too complex to work or or with" would be. Those are related, but not necessarily the same. -- David Kastrup
