Hi David, On Fri 06 Jan 2012 17:19, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> writes:
> But the point Alex was making is that we should not encourage any > usage of Scheme that might work only with Guile My understanding of Alex's point was that portability has advantages. I certainly benefit from using Alex's code, for example, although Alex mostly uses other Scheme implementations. Differing from the Scheme standard is totally OK, but it discourages code sharing among Scheme systems. A trade-off, that's all. > Why should we strive hard to make Guile worse than necessary Nobody is arguing this :) Regards, Andy -- http://wingolog.org/
