On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 7:06 AM, Noah Lavine <noah.b.lav...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Nala Ginrut <nalagin...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > well, I see. I haven't used Stalin before, so I guess the generated C > code > > must be compiled without any Gcc extension? > > I think he's making a joke that Richard Stallman is always pedantic, > so the -pedantic flag is redundant. > > cool. If Stallman imply -pedantic, then you may consider "Stallman -hasty" for enabling Gcc extension. > > @Noah: Anyway, will you add r5rs support to it? I found Stalin doesn't > > provide that. > > I would love to. That is far in the future, though - my current goal > is to type-check Tree-IL. I have been working on that, and I think I > am close to having something ready to show, although not quite there. > Expect an email about the wip-compiler branch in the next few days. > > cool too~
