On Fri 02 Sep 2011 15:33, Ian Price <ianpric...@googlemail.com> writes:
> Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com> writes: > >> On the whole I am skeptical. But, Chez Scheme and Racket both made this >> change. So I could go either way, though I would like thoughts from >> other people before proceeding. > > While I like the change, another solution is to try to make a > 'syntax-case' form that returns a lambda like syntax-rules. I do not like this, though feel free to write it for yourself ;-) Andy -- http://wingolog.org/
