Hi! Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com> skribis:
> So, the status: > > 1) Builds. > 2) Passes make check. > 3) Can update the available list. > 4) Everything else is untested :-) Sounds like great news! > I will see if I can get work to sponsor a server that we can use, and > see if we can get it aliased to guildhall.gnu.org -- unless someone else > would like to provide the server. It would be nice to have root on that > server, FWIW. It could be a VM. I believe FSF could lend us a server or VM, which would thus be “independent”, but we’d need to check. > As far as relation with dorodango goes, we should do our best to keep > the guildhall compatible with dorodango archives on the net. We should > also try hard to share code, but that is secondary. Farther along I > would like to rename (dorodango ...) in our source to (guildhall ...) or > something so that we don't conflict with upstream. I would also like to > reduce the number of bundled dependencies, and for the ones that are > left, include them under the (guildhall ...) namespace, making them > effectively private. That way you can also install dorodango on your > machine, if you wish, and also install the wak- packages, industria, > ocelotl, etc. Sounds cool. Since the project may become quite central, it would be nice if it could be FSF-copyrighted. That’s obviously something to discuss with Andreas, but the sooner the better. Thanks for the fast & efficient work! Ludo’.
