Hello! Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com> writes:
> On Tue 03 May 2011 10:50, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >> Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com> writes: >> >>> Currently when you define a SMOB type or set a name on a vtable, a >>> corresponding class is automatically exported from (oop goops). This >>> breaks modularity, and I think we should stop doing it in 2.2. >> >> I agree that they should not be exported from (oop goops). >> >> However, how should GOOPS users access these classes then? There needs >> to be a way to get the class object associated with a SMOB type, for >> instance. > > Hum, a good question! Perhaps smob-name->class, Yes, why not. (It’s equivalent to (@@ (oop goops) foobar) in terms of providing access to everyone, though.) Thanks, Ludo’.
