Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com> writes: >> Does this code mean that we load the script twice, in the -ds case? > > I think so, yes; unfortunately. Fixed. Would this merit a quick 2.0.2, > you think?
I guess that would be better, if Ludo has time to make the release.
>> Do we go interactive after seeing a -e option? I don't see a setting of
>> the interactive? variable that would prevent this?
>
> This appears to be the old behavior. Am I mistaken?
No, sorry, I was. This is fine then.
Regards,
Neil
