Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com> writes: > Hi Andreas, > > On Thu 24 Mar 2011 01:47, Andreas Rottmann <a.rottm...@gmx.at> writes: > >> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: >> >>> Could you send a patch to update the manual? >>> >> I have started working on this, but I'm notorious (at least to myself) >> for starving documentation-related work with interesting coding stuff >> that comes along, so don't hold your breath ;-). > > Believe me, I understand. However if you don't do it, it means someone > else has to, or otherwise we go without docs. > > I can think of various kinds of patch economies out there. If there > existed people that just like to document other people's work, then we > could indeed think of this arrangement as the most efficient. > > However until such a person comes along, the most fair thing seems to be > for those that have the pleasure of interesting coding also handle their > share of documentation. > > So, if you have time, we would appreciate docs on these pieces of Guile > :) > I've put it firmly on my TODO list, but can't promise a timeframe, as I'm a bit busy IRL (moving next week). Since R6RS' text can be reused in large parts, it shouldn't be too much work, however.
Regards, Rotty -- Andreas Rottmann -- <http://rotty.yi.org/>
