[sorry, this should of course have been CC'd to the list too...] Hi Andy,
I saw this change and couldn't fully understand it. Given that you
ended up adding GC_disable() and GC_enable() around the GC_malloc()
call, couldn't you just have done that without all the other changes
from "t->" to "t." ?
I'm probably missing something, but could you point it out?
Thanks,
Neil
