On Wed 23 Feb 2011 16:10, Noah Lavine <noah.b.lav...@gmail.com> writes:
> I need to ask for help in order to work on this more. I thought I > would first move the code-generating functions to their own module. It > seems like this should be a simple and obviously-correct > transformation, because I didn't change any code - just moved it to > its own module, and replaced its definition by a (use-modules ...) > clause. Yet I have somehow created an error, and I don't see why. I haven't tried it yet, but there is a circularity: peg-sexp-compile from your (ice-9 peg codegen) references peg-string-compile, but peg-string-compile is implemented in (ice-9 peg). I'm not sure exactly how to break that circle. For now if you're feeling hacky, you can ((module-ref (resolve-interface '(ice-9 peg)) 'peg-string-compile) ...) in that (peg ...) case. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/
