Hi, Andy Wingo <[email protected]> writes:
> On Sat 18 Sep 2010 23:50, [email protected] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-libunistring/2010-09/msg00004.html >> >> The conclusion is that we’d better use raw ‘iconv’ calls in such >> cases... > > Boo. I guess this is a 2.0 blocker. Bruno's strategy appears (as usual) > to be the right one... Yes to both... Ludo’.
