Hi, On Sun 01 Aug 2010 20:44, Andreas Rottmann <a.rottm...@gmx.at> writes:
> I've spotted an issue with your fix: the way 64-bit random numbers are > generated in scm_random() is bogus; Grr, indeed. Fix applied, thanks. >> Would you be interested in [importing another rng]? We would need >> some test suites too, I think, and possibly changes to the scm_t_rng >> structure. >> > Sorry, I don't have the inclination to work on this ATM. Also, random > number tests are kinda hard to write -- it's random stuff, after all > :-). Too bad, we could really use it, and now is the time for any needed ABI breaks. Thanks anyway for the fix! Andy -- http://wingolog.org/
