[email protected] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hello,
>
> I was under the impression that Windows users would often prefer
> software that requires “only” MinGW, as opposed to the more heavyweight
> Cygwin. From that point of view a MinGW port seems to be useful,
> especially if Guile does part of the OS abstraction job that Cygwin
> does.
Yes, agreed now. It was wrong of me to suggest that MinGW support might
not be necessary...
> I agree that portability tricks should primarily be directed to Gnulib.
Thanks,
Neil
