On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 7:01 AM, Ludovic Courtès <[email protected]> wrote: > What I meant is that Scheme’s disjoint boolean type should be considered > the Right Thing. I’d rather keep it really disjoint, at the cost of > weaker/less trivial interop, than going the elisp road too far.
Are you guys discussing something like a foreign function interface for Scheme to Elisp and vice versa? Sorry for the dense question as from what I have read it started very technical, and I am wondering what is the overarching vision.
