Hi, > I think having Guile bindings to GSL would be great. Which line of > development are you referring to?
Oh, I was referring to the development of Guile bindings for GSL, in general. > FWIW, I think it would be great if these bindings were eventually > integrated in the GSL package proper. To that end, you should make sure > to follow the GNU Coding Standards, to provide good test coverage and > documentation, and to make sure copyright can be assigned to the FSF. Thanks for your suggestions. I will do. > I suppose SRFI-4 homogeneous numeric vectors[*] would be a good fit for > GSL vectors and matrices, and you wouldn’t need to create any new SMOB > type. That said, I’m sure you know GSL much better than me. :-) The SRFI-4 homogeneous numeric vectors do seem to be designed for this purpose. My SMOB approach was entirely because of my familiarity with GSL's interface and my unfamiliarity with Guile. Thanks! Jason
