On Mon 19 Oct 2009 15:52, Ken Raeburn <raeb...@raeburn.org> writes: > On Oct 18, 2009, at 18:44, Neil Jerram wrote: > >> Your change looks straightforward, but the "More arguments than >> specifiers" comment makes it look as though it might have been >> intentional to let the !scm_is_pair (z) case through. >> >> I don't fully understand what the comment means, though. Do you? >> Specifically, what is the sense of `CLASS != ENV'? > > Unfortunately, I don't; I was hoping someone more familiar with it could > check it. > Even if it's intended to fetch word 0 from a non-pair object at the end, > SCM_CAR is the wrong way to do it.
FWIW, this will change when GOOPS dispatch lands in the VM. So it might not be worth worrying about. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/
