Neil Jerram <n...@ossau.uklinux.net> writes: > Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com> writes: > >> Oh man, at some point we have some pain coming, switching to >> srfi-35/r6rs exceptions. We mentioned it in August and decided to punt >> indefinitely -- though should someone be interested, help would be >> welcome ;-) > > Yeah, we should do that. Here's an outline design. > > - Core concept is that libguile exceptions are srfi-34/srfi-35 objects. > (I haven't yet checked for detailed changes between srfi-34/srfi-35 > and r6rs. Are there any?) > SRFI-34 is compatible with R6RS, but SRFI-35 is not; I'm not sure wether they are fundamentally incompatible (i.e. neither is implementable on top of the other).
Regards, Rotty -- Andreas Rottmann -- <http://rotty.yi.org/>