Neil Jerram <n...@ossau.uklinux.net> writes:

> Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com> writes:
>
>> Oh man, at some point we have some pain coming, switching to
>> srfi-35/r6rs exceptions. We mentioned it in August and decided to punt
>> indefinitely -- though should someone be interested, help would be
>> welcome ;-)
>
> Yeah, we should do that.  Here's an outline design.
>
> - Core concept is that libguile exceptions are srfi-34/srfi-35 objects.
>   (I haven't yet checked for detailed changes between srfi-34/srfi-35
>   and r6rs.  Are there any?)
>
SRFI-34 is compatible with R6RS, but SRFI-35 is not; I'm not sure wether
they are fundamentally incompatible (i.e. neither is implementable on
top of the other).

Regards, Rotty
-- 
Andreas Rottmann -- <http://rotty.yi.org/>


Reply via email to