Hello, Neil Jerram <n...@ossau.uklinux.net> writes:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: [...] >> Ugly stuff like ‘scm_fixup_weak_alist ()’ would still be needed. > > Thanks, I understand now. scm_fixup_weak_alist looks OK to me. Surely > we must have had something like that with Guile GC too? (Except that it > was probably mixed up with the GC'ing code, and so was even uglier!) Well, indeed. >>> SCM_UNDEFINED == 0 is sounding promising... >> >> Yeah. Sorry for the false hope about SCM_BOOL_F == 0. > > So are you going to try out SCM_UNDEFINED == 0 ? Who, me? :-) I’ll add it to my to-do list and report back, then. Thanks, Ludo’.
