Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com> writes:
> Hi Mike,
>
> On Sun 21 Jun 2009 08:31, Mike Gran <spk...@yahoo.com> writes:
>
>> Not really in a position to help, since I'm still AFK, but,
>> somewhere along the line I pushed this patch to r6rs vectors
>> in the String_abstraction2 tree.
>
> Took me a little while to understand it, but it seems the patch is
> right. I committed and pushed it to master. Linas, can you try again?
>
> Thanks much!
I've pushed a deterministic test for this (also below). (In general,
when fixing something that isn't already reliably reproduced by the
build, please write a regression test if feasible.)
Neil
>From 4574ec212aad4df9571463ee4d45beb2607e51ad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Neil Jerram <n...@ossau.uklinux.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 13:31:20 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Deterministic test for the r6rs-ports.test segmentation fault
* test-suite/tests/r6rs-ports.test ("7.2.7 Input Ports"): Add (gc), to
test the (ex-)bug in cbp_mark () when marking a closed port.
---
test-suite/tests/r6rs-ports.test | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/test-suite/tests/r6rs-ports.test b/test-suite/tests/r6rs-ports.test
index 829258f..df12e5c 100644
--- a/test-suite/tests/r6rs-ports.test
+++ b/test-suite/tests/r6rs-ports.test
@@ -342,6 +342,7 @@
close!)))
(close-port port)
+ (gc) ; Test for marking a closed port.
closed?)))
--
1.5.6.5
