Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com> writes: > One question is that I've been calling this thing 1.9.1 under the > assumption that we made a 1.9.0; but that does not seem to be the case. > Should this one be 1.9.0 or 1.9.1?
I'd say 1.9.0. > guile-config and pkg-config We should deprecate the former, BTW, if this hasn't already been done. > (system xref), procedure-callers, procedure-callees, can work as > variables get redefined I think this should be added to the manual as well. > BUG: SCM_SNAME -> SCM_SUBR_NAME Ooh, I didn't worry much about it back then. Should we? > FIXME: update copyrights Yes. (There's "(add-hook 'write-file-hooks 'copyright-update)", which I find convenient.) > ecmascript support? Yes, although it's currently undocumented. > new function: scm_module_public_interface Speaking of which, I was thinking at some point about adding a `public-interface' slot to `module-type', to avoid hash table lookups. What do you think? Thanks, Ludo'.
