Hello, Julian Graham <jool...@gmail.com> writes:
> Hey, if we're open to extending the module system, then sure -- that > would certainly make for a cleaner, more efficient implementation. > That's got my vote. Cool! ;-) The trick is to extend it in a backward-compatible way as much as possible. But now that we have hygiene and `use-syntax' has been sort-of phased out (Andy?), that should be doable. Perhaps we could create a branch so that you could experiment things? Thanks, Ludo'.
