Hi all,
Find attached a small patch that fixes a few instances of a typo in
the documentation for SRFI-11 -- the manual was incorrectly referring
to `let*-values' as `let-values*'.
Regards,
Julian
From f725da157cabfc9575a6ffe21812182997088370 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Julian Graham <jul...@transmetropolitan.(none)>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 10:25:04 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Update SRFI-11 docs to use correct name for let*-values.
---
doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi | 8 ++++----
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi b/doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi
index b1fdde1..1fa50b2 100644
--- a/doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi
+++ b/doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ get the relevant SRFI documents from the SRFI home page
* SRFI-8:: receive.
* SRFI-9:: define-record-type.
* SRFI-10:: Hash-Comma Reader Extension.
-* SRFI-11:: let-values and let-values*.
+* SRFI-11:: let-values and let*-values.
* SRFI-13:: String library.
* SRFI-14:: Character-set library.
* SRFI-16:: case-lambda
@@ -1514,9 +1514,9 @@ the anonymous and compact syntax of @nicode{#,()} is much better.
@cindex SRFI-11
@findex let-values
-...@findex let-values*
+...@findex let*-values
This module implements the binding forms for multiple values
-...@code{let-values} and @code{let-values*}. These forms are similar to
+...@code{let-values} and @code{let*-values}. These forms are similar to
@code{let} and @code{let*} (@pxref{Local Bindings}), but they support
binding of the values returned by multiple-valued expressions.
@@ -1533,7 +1533,7 @@ available.
@code{let-values} performs all bindings simultaneously, which means that
no expression in the binding clauses may refer to variables bound in the
-same clause list. @code{let-values*}, on the other hand, performs the
+same clause list. @code{let*-values}, on the other hand, performs the
bindings sequentially, just like @code{let*} does for single-valued
expressions.
--
1.5.6.3
