Hello!
You rock! I didn't read it in details, but I'm amazed by the clarity of
the explanations and the level of details, so thank you!
A bit of nitpicking since it's what I'm good at:
Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com> writes:
> Guile has both an interpreter and a compiler. To a user, the
> difference is largely transparent -- interpreted and compiled
I think "transparent---interpreted" yields the typographically correct
output in Info/TeX.
> For a long time, Guile only had an interpreter, called the evaluator.
Maybe "@defn{evaluator}" and perhaps also an `...@cindex'.
> values, call/cc) and can provide optimized inline instructions for
> Guile (cons, struct-ref, etc.).
A couple of `...@code' here.
Other than these small formatting issues, the material appears to be
very good to me.
Keep up the good work! :-)
Ludo'.
