Hello, Miroslav Lichvar <mlich...@redhat.com> writes:
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 10:30:19PM +0000, Neil Jerram wrote: >> 2008/11/21 Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org>: >> > I confirm it works with CBIPs in Guile-R6RS-Libs, but I had to make this >> > small change: >> > >> > >> > http://repo.or.cz/w/guile-r6rs-libs.git?a=commitdiff;h=dfab2fe21f82bc40cfdf9a3a3eeb6936d5935c8c >> > >> > IOW, with Guile up to 1.8.5, it was harmless to leave `read_buf_size' >> > uninitialized (actually, zeroed), which was OK since CBIPs don't use it, >> > but the change in `scm_c_read ()' makes it necessary to initialize it. >> > It's probably a reasonable expectation, though. >> >> Hmm. I agree that this isn't ideal. I guess it's OK for now though. >> >> > Please commit! >> >> Thanks, doing that now. > > It seems that the optimizations broke lilypond, it's now failing with > this message: > > ports.c:978: scm_fill_input: Assertion `pt->read_pos == pt->read_end' failed. Ouch! > A bug report is here: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477007 Can you get a full C backtrace? A quick grep reveals that Lilypond does not create any custom port type, which isn't reassuring... Thanks, Ludo'.
