Mikael Djurfeldt escreveu: >> Yes, that's what I meant by "happily traverse circular lists". :-)
> Having been part of Guile development for some time, it's sad to see > how much work is put into changing code back and forth due to > vacillating development goals. It's apparent how important it is to > have a written development policy with design decisions and > motivations. Probably a lot of that should also be put directly into > the code in the form of comments. +1 I am participating in GUILE since it is a foundation of LilyPond. As far as I am concerned, it should be fast, bug-free, standards-compliant and should not have any code that is so complex that it will bitrot when its developer takes off. That is why I am bothered by the half-working elisp support: my impression is that is not really used, so once Neil stops doing his job, GUILE will be left with a bunch of weird code that noone knows how to deal with. All this also makes me wonder why there are no Gnucash developers here, since I recall they actually do use GUILE for a lot of stuff. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
