Ludovic Courtès escreveu: >>> I'm still in favor of "git revert" since the log message makes it clear >>> which patch was reverted and why. "We" can then take our time and work >>> out a proper fix, and finally re-merge the patch plus its fix. >>> Furthermore, in the eventuality where none of us eventually finds a fix, >>> `master' is left in the previous state, which is better IMO. >> 'master' in its previous states grows the heap to 600M doing the 1000-fold >> version of srfi-18 test I posted. I think it's not a good solution. >> >> Commenting out the assert for x86-64 should yield better behavior. > > Alright, then please go ahead.
Pushed (without changelog entry). -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
