Hi, "Julian Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, there's a reference implementation of SRFI-89 that (I think) > could just be dropped in and used, now that we have SRFI-88-style > keywords. It looks like the license terms would indeed allow us to do that. I'm not sure whether there's a precedent including non-LGPL SRFI code as is, though. Besides, we'd have to check whether the reference implementation, which targets Gambit's compiler, is suitable for Guile. Thoughts? > I was just hoping that the existence of `(ice-9 optargs)' > would make possible a more compact / potentially more efficient > implementation. Yes, it also stroke me as a worthy goal at first, but the differences you listed led me to think we might be better off with a separate implementation. Thanks, and sorry for the hassle! Ludovic.
