[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Without the patch, `c-tokenize.c' includes *only* <inttypes.h> (see my > first comment above.)
Right you are - it may be that this is just confusion from long ago. >> Does guile have a position on supporting systems that don't conform to >> C99? I'm wondering if I should try to figure this out and get a fix >> that is reasonable (I agree this one is gross and likely wrong), or just >> punt. > > Guile is written using C89 code. It does use C99 headers when > available, but does not usually rely on them I think. > > I believe the "position" is roughly to be portable to any platform with > Guile users. :-) Yes, that sounds great. I have just been running into "claims C99 but sort of broken" fairly often lately, and wanted guidance - it's difficult trying to deal with pkgsrc patches for platforms I don't have.
