[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hi,
>
> I have a patch that further "despaghettifies" the evaluator, as Han-Wen
> would say. ;-)
Can you say more about how your change despaghettifies the code? I
can see that it makes eval.c shorter - but what else?
> It adds two files, `eval-memoize.i.c' and
> `eval-unmemoize.i.c',
Do these need to be .i.c - i.e. implying that they need to be
#included? Can't they be normal .c files?
> and moves memoizers in the former and unmemoizers
> in the latter.
I assume the memoizer and the unmemoizer for a particular kind of
expression need to be consistent with each other - is that right? If
so, it seems to me that putting them in separate files might increase
the likelihood of future mistakes.
Regards,
Neil
_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
