[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > > (let* ((vtable (make-vtable-vtable "pr" 0)) > (s1 (make-struct vtable 0 "hello")) > (s2 (make-struct vtable 0 "hello"))) > ;; S1 and S2 are both "regular" one-field structs.
I know the "values" struct is doing exactly this, but I suspect it's abusing the vtable system. I suspect that what scm_init_stacks() in stacks.c is doing is normal (if there's such a thing as "normal"). > So I think it's even more confusing than it seems. ;-) Yep, very confusing :-). > I'd say that `make-vtable-vtable' is inappropriately named and should > really be `make-vtable'. Does that make sense? Perhaps we have an expert lurking here, but I think make-vtable-vtable does in fact do what its name suggests: make a vtable for creating vtables. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
