Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > If not now, is there any sort of timescale for when this is scheduled?
Hopefully never for many bits. I think several things have been tagged unnecessarily. If something is not very nice, then by all means shunt it off to a corner of the manual and advertise the good way. But taking stuff out is bad. > I think it is reasonable to let deprecated interfaces live for one stable > release, You yourself have complained about things changed and removed, no? SCM_STRING_CHARS perhaps ... :-) One stable is much too short. Surely it's not reasonable to expect everyone to review all their programs on every stable release. > to allow people to update broken programs, and remove them after > that. My point is that many bits in question aren't and weren't broken. Not too nice, sure, but not utterly hopeless. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
