Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Though I haven't thought about them carefully in this context yet, I >> wondered to what extent (if any) the following might be relevant: >> >> - SRFI-7 >> http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-7/srfi-7.html [...] > It doesn't explicitly state whether feature identifiers are (partly) > standardized as those of SRFI-0. Could we use any Guile feature name in > here? I had overlooked the syntax specification which reads: <feature identifier> --> a symbol which is the name of a SRFI So I think it rules it out for the purposes at hand. Thanks, Ludovic. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
