Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> Thanks; I've applied most of it to HEAD,
>
> If it's any good then it's worth having in the 1.8 branch, no need for
> doc clarifications to wait the 3 years between major releases :-).

Agreed; done.

>> with slight edits so as not to make the point too many times.
>
> Looks a little verbose still.

Yes, but I think it's useful all the same.

>  Perhaps separating each #:init-foo
> would be clearer.

Do you mean making separate @deffn's, or just paragraph breaks between
the sentences covering the different keywords?

Regards,
     Neil



_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel

Reply via email to