[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > > The problem can be reproduced using the program found at the end of this > post. It could hardly be turned into a test case, however.
I made some memory leak checks for myself by demanding that "(assoc-ref (gc-stats) 'bytes-malloced)" was steady across some repetitions of a test. That's actually a different number though (is it?), but it should in theory be possible to exercise some of the malloc/free counting or balancing (post 1.8 that is :-). _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
