Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I doubt you'll ever get any feedback like that. Making something that > takes advantage of gcc but does no harm in vanilla c89 or c99 is in a > sense the best of both worlds.
C99 defines `inline', so nothing wrong problem with that. As for C89, it would do no harm with it: the function's code will simply be duplicated in all files that use it, except that it will not be inlined. At worst, some compilers may raise warnings about the function being declared as `static' but unused. To me, this looks acceptable. If anyone has better suggestions, that's cool. But please, don't leave `scm_is_pair ()' as is. Thanks, Ludovic. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
