Hi, Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If you're not supposed to use it then any warnings it provokes when > you do aren't a big deal :). Right. ;-) > Now that srfi-1 has a lot more C code it's probably worth using for > performance. Yes, that's the point I was trying to make: this module had better use SRFI-1 as much as possible (also for maintainability and consistency reasons). Thanks, Ludovic. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
