Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Well, almost. The scm_stand_in_scm_procs need to be weak too.
It is; this change will remain in 1.6. Sorry that I wasn't clear about that. With "too large" I was only referring to the changed semantics of weak hash tables and guardians. -- GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405 _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
