Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Shouldn't this be excercised by a test as well?
Maybe, but I don't see an easy way to do that in the normal svr4 linker case. If we had a static-only platform and were using libtool -dlopen the way it's meant to be then I guess it'd bomb. > I'm loosing you here, AFAIK, the C compiler treats > > extern struct bla foo[] ; > extern struct bla *foo ; > > exactly the same in a function call of the form > > preload (foo) No, the first says at foo you'll find a struct bla (or several). The second says at foo you'll find 4 bytes, those being an address (of a struct, or several). The generated code differs accordingly (an extra fetch for the latter). > Anyway, it seems to work. Will you commit? My change? Yes, I think so. The radical alternative would be to ditch the private ltdl the same as in the head, but Rob can thin about that. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
