Here you have:

https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=620566
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733535
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=693531

And here you have some downstream patches:
https://github.com/Alexpux/MINGW-packages/tree/master/mingw-w64-gobject-introspection

Cheers.

On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Jasper St. Pierre <jstpie...@mecheye.net>
wrote:

> I can take a look at the gobject-introspection work. Bugzilla links?
>
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Ignacio Casal Quinteiro
> <nacho.r...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Jasper St. Pierre <
> jstpie...@mecheye.net>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Would it be possible for me to fund / help maintain official GNOME
> >> Win32 bundles and an SDK? I'd love to improve Windows support of GTK+,
> >> but I'm never sure where the status is. Last time I tried jhbuild it
> >> failed on something early on -- I believe fontconfig, so that was a
> >> bummer.
> >
> >
> > Well the current status is quite good compared with how it was a few
> years
> > ago.
> > The main problems are still:
> > 1. that we have lots of downstream patches still on msys2, even though I
> > spent quite a lot of time pushing them upstream.
> > 2. building anything out of git is a nightmare, you need a tarball or
> > everything gets in your way
> > 3. gobject-introspection could get quite a bit of love for windows. There
> > are though some patches in bugzilla that are waiting some review.
> > 4. jhbuild would require some serious work.
> >
> > Cheers.
> >
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Emmanuele Bassi <eba...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> > Hi;
> >> >
> >> > On 11 June 2015 at 13:44, anatoly techtonik <techto...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> >> On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 9:22 PM, Emmanuele Bassi <eba...@gmail.com>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> The current stance of everyone involved in the Windows backend for
> >> >>> GLib and GTK+ is to stop advertising binary builds for Windows — as
> we
> >> >>> don't do that for any other platform, and nobody sticks around long
> >> >>> enough to keep doing that or to set up a continuous integration
> build
> >> >>> for GTK.
> >> >>
> >> >> Stop advertising == stop supporting?
> >> >
> >> > If I wanted to say "stop supporting", I would have said that. Not that
> >> > we *ever* "supported" binary builds, on any platform. If you want
> >> > commercial support, you should contract somebody.
> >> >
> >> > Currently, we advertise ad hoc Windows builds on gtk.org; those are
> >> > out of date, and lack many of the bug fixes that went into GTK. This
> >> > situation is confusing for application developers, and makes the
> >> > project look bad. It also reflect badly on the great work that
> >> > developers have been doing in order to make GTK work well on Windows.
> >> >
> >> > On top of that, we don't offer binary builds for any other platform,
> >> > and instead rely on distributors — like Homebrew on Mac; the *BSD
> >> > ports; or the various Linux distributions — to provide binary builds
> >> > for them. Windows is an anomaly, mostly because there weren't
> >> > good/usable software distributions in the past. This has now changed,
> >> > and it's a good thing to ensure that developers on Windows get
> >> > reliable, up to date software.
> >> >
> >> >>> Developers using the G* core platform libraries on Windows are
> >> >>> strongly encouraged to use the MSYS2 distribution:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>   https://msys2.github.io/
> >> >>
> >> >> Like Git? Ship 200Mb of "additional value" on top? Just for
> comparison
> >> >> Mercurial installation is 37Mb compared with 267Mb of Git. And that
> for
> >> >> every GTK application?
> >> >
> >> > MSYS2 is for developers, not for end users.
> >> >
> >> > You're supposed to set up the development enviroment on *your*
> >> > development machine(s); once you have built your application, you can
> >> > take your binary artefacts, including the DLLs you depend on, put them
> >> > into an installer, and let your users download the installer — which
> >> > is exactly what you should have done in the past, even with pre-built
> >> > DLLs. The intended change is for application developers to get
> >> > pre-built, up to date binaries using MSYS2, instead of downloading zip
> >> > files from gtk.org that we cannot reliably keep up to date.
> >> >
> >> > Telling your users to download your application; download DLLs from
> >> > gtk.org; shove them into some directory; and, finally, hope for the
> >> > best, was never a good software distribution mechanism.
> >> >
> >> >>> This will provide you with pre-built packages that are known to work
> >> >>> and maintained. It also allows you to build your own packages on top
> >> >>> of it, and create an installer from the result.
> >> >>
> >> >> Can GTK be cross-compiled for Windows?
> >> >
> >> > Yes, it can, and it routinely is.
> >> >
> >> >>> What the GTK team would love, on the other hand, is somebody putting
> >> >>> the effort in setting up and maintaining a continuous integration
> >> >>> service — similar to https://build.gnome.org — for Windows builds.
> >> >>> This way we would be able to catch build regressions after every
> >> >>> commit, without relying on the application developers to file bugs.
> >> >>
> >> >> http://www.appveyor.com/ if using closed source service is okay.
> >> >
> >> > No, it's really not — especially if it has to run on the gnome.org
> >> > infrastructure.
> >> >
> >> > Ciao,
> >> >  Emmanuele.
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > https://www.bassi.io
> >> > [@] ebassi [@gmail.com]
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > gtk-devel-list mailing list
> >> > gtk-devel-l...@gnome.org
> >> > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >>   Jasper
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> gtk-list mailing list
> >> gtk-list@gnome.org
> >> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ignacio Casal Quinteiro
>
>
>
> --
>   Jasper
>



-- 
Ignacio Casal Quinteiro
_______________________________________________
gtk-list mailing list
gtk-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list

Reply via email to