On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Chris Vine <ch...@cvine.freeserve.co.uk>wrote:
> > Out of interest, why do you do this, other than for the purpose of > making test runs to see what may lie ahead with gtk+-4.0? > I'm not the one doing it, but one workflow I can imagine is that used DISABLE_DEPRECATED on gtk2 to test forward porting and left it in place for gtk3 because there was no obvious reason not to. > > > to run. The reasons why the original poster's code failed to work > appears to be that he was not using the function calls correctly, > irrespective of version number or deprecation. > well, there were two issues. he should not have been using them at all in the particular context that they were being called from, because of the requirements of RT programming. but he also had the issue that the functions were indeed missing when he tried to build his code (he never indicated whether this was a compile, link or run time missing) --p
_______________________________________________ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
