On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 6:36 AM, Bastien Nocera <had...@hadess.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 06:33 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> we are getting ready to start development of gtk 3.90 in master.
>> To avoid causing lots of breakage and irritation, here is the plan:
>>
>> 1) Switch the modulesets to use the gtk-3-22 branch for the gtk
>> module
>> 2) Rename the gtk module to gtk3
>> 3) Add a gtk4 module that follows master
>> 4) Switch applications over to use gtk4 as they are found to work
>>
>> If you see a problem with that, please let me know.
>
> Which would mean nothing called "gtk+" in the modulesets? Why not keep
> either gtk 3.x or gtk 4.x with that name?
>
> I'd expect the "gtk+" module to build GTK+ 4.x ("the latest").
I have no strong opinion on this. Not having gtk+ in the moduleset
doesn't seem like a big deal to me. The + in the name is a bit
awkward, tbh.
_______________________________________________
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
