On 08/09/2011 21:21, Kean Johnston wrote: > so even > if we named the DLL's a bit less specifically (and just used, for example, > glib2.dll) that still shouldn't be a problem.
And how exactly is doing that different from what we already have today: libglib-2.0-0.dll? mvg, Dieter _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
