On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Ross Burton <r...@burtonini.com> wrote: > On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 16:00 +0200, Petr Tomasek wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 05:51:56PM +0100, Ross Burton wrote: >> > On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 12:32 -0400, David Zeuthen wrote: >> > > (Btw, this infrastructure is not specific to the gphoto2:// GVfs >> > > backend; any GVfs backend can use it - say, a Flickr backend). >> > >> > Bad example, downloading the original file (no seeking in HTTP) just to >> >> HTTP_RANGE? > > Thanks to latency I imagine it would actually be faster to download the > entire image than attempt to "seek" around a file over HTTP. > > Ross > -- > Ross Burton mail: r...@burtonini.com > jabber: r...@burtonini.com > www: http://burtonini.com
I made a nice image of my last benchmark: http://img36.imageshack.us/i/scalingperformance.png/ The one with just 21 seconds is where all my images are in cache. That's also where all my cores are working at 100% The other thread benchmark (70 seconds) vauses all cores to work at ~40% _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
