2009/3/2 Mark Doffman <mark.doff...@codethink.co.uk>
> <SNIP>
>
>
> Methods are declared by:
>
> method methodName {
> enumName anenum;
> } reply {
> structName astruct;
> } throws (ErrorOne, ErrorTwo);
>
If you are so keen on clearing out that this is not really a 'method' then
why is it declared as such? Why not call it 'message'?
Both the throws and reply clauses are optional, but if a method does not
> have a reply it should not have a throws clause.
>
Is this a limitation of DBus or you spec or the IDL? It seems odd that
methodTakingEnum(in i myEnum) can not return a DBus error if myEnum is out
of range...
And also; can we not call it something other than didl? It is impossible to
google as there are already tonnes of didls - not to mention the infamous
Diddl mouse that Google is pretty convinced that I am really wanting to
search for (which may or may not be correct, but please don't go there) :-)
Anyways I am really glad that someone is looking into this, but I also hope
that we end up with only one IDL and not N > 1.
--
Cheers,
Mikkel
_______________________________________________
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
